Individual skill

ljg-paper

Explain research papers to readers without a specialist background: what the paper studies, what the authors contribute, how the findings follow, and what the evidence does not establish. USE WHEN the user shares an arXiv link, paper URL, PDF, local paper, or paper title, or asks to read, explain, analyze, or understand a paper. Defaults to a saved Markdown note. NOT FOR reproduction, formal peer review, benchmark tables, or literature surveys.

skills/ljg-paper/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 76b5fb9b657f420287a421737a3a9778c9e53379

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
7,730
Repository last updated
Nov 2, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# ljg-paper:讲清论文,让读者理解结论是怎样得来的

默认读者有一般生活经验和理解能力,但不熟悉论文所属行业,也不知道该行业常用的对象、工具和工作方式。用户指定了读者背景时,以其指定为准。

从读者能够直接理解的事情出发,讲清谁在什么条件下做了什么、为什么遇到困难、作者改变了哪个环节,以及结果怎样变化。专业名称在有助于识别论文贡献时引入;读者在记住名称之前,应已理解它指向的事情。

读者最终既能用普通话解释论文的思想,也能说清作者实际研究了什么、做出了什么贡献。生活案例承担解释时,应明确对应论文中的角色与关系,并区分假想示例和真实实验。

全文围绕论文能够支持的具体问题,让读者看见问题为何需要解决、原有判断有何依据,以及证据怎样支持新的判断。具体对象和动作应持续承担解释;随着解释深入,可以更换案例或场景,但要交代它补充了什么。现场感来自与理解有关的细节,不靠虚构心理或夸大结论。

完整的解释应给读者留下亲自解释或迁移的空间。文章写出了判断重构的过程,仍不能证明读者实际经历了这一过程。依据论文组织解释,允许补充、确认、区分和保留未知,不强求反转、统一机制或固定四段结构;默认完整交付,互动按用户意愿进行。

当关键关系需要读者在脑中自行拼装时,优先考虑 ASCII 图来呈现信息流向、前后状态或不同维度,再沿具体例子读图。是否用图、用几幅,由它能否减少理解负担决定,不固定故事或图数。
Back to top