Individual skill
vibe-techdesign
Write an MVP technical design from agreed requirements, including architecture choices and relevant tradeoffs.
workflow/skills/vibe-techdesign/SKILL.md
Source commit d26fb0d8a9cdac94cf99f004087620487e4da33d
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 3,229
- Repository last updated
- Oct 4, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai-agents Repository topic
- ai-workflow Repository topic
- beginner-friendly Repository topic
- mvp-development Repository topic
- technical-design Repository topic
- vibe-coding Repository topic
- llm-tools Repository topic
- workflow-automation Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- chatgpt Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
- design Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 2,047 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 2,047 bytesreferences/cli-output.mddoc · 729 bytesreferences/question-bank.mddoc · 3,336 bytes
Read excerpt
# MVP technical design
Read the agreed requirements and reuse Handoff Context. Inspect an existing
project's stack and relevant implementation before proposing replacements.
Ask only for consequential choices that remain unresolved; a known answer
does not need another confirmation echo.
Describe the architecture needed for the core journey: component/service
boundaries, data ownership, integration contracts, deployment target, and
relevant failure behavior. Prefer the smallest design that meets requirements.
Add auth, storage, infrastructure, AI, or paid services only when justified.
Verify changing vendor details from the installed code or official sources.
Record meaningful tradeoffs, compatibility constraints, migration/recovery