Individual skill

freelancer-review

Review a freelancer's supplied agreement across fourteen commercial lenses, with clause evidence, actual-work questions and scoped classification limits. Use when assessing a client or independent-contractor agreement. Trigger with "freelancer-review" or "review this contract as a freelancer".

plugins/business-tools/general-legal-assistant/skills/freelancer-review/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 0500b275e963c027f6b410e8c49c0446945c574e

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 12, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
2,917
Repository last updated
Nov 12, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Freelancer Agreement Review

## Overview

Review supplied terms from the identified freelancer's perspective and identify
commercial concerns, missing facts and questions for qualified review. Keep
contract wording separate from actual working arrangements and legal classification.

## Prerequisites

- The selected agreement, available SOWs/schedules and requested review scope.
- The user's role, objectives, work location/jurisdiction when known, rate/scope
  context and any actual working-practice facts they provide. Reuse explicit
  context; do not guess the represented party or claim rates are market-standard.
Back to top