Individual skill

snowflake-cost-leak-hunter

Audit and analyze Snowflake warehouse, serverless, Adaptive, storage, transfer, and AI cost evidence with a typed ledger that prevents double counting and exposes freshness, attribution, control, and invoice boundaries. Use when a Snowflake bill increased, a team needs chargeback/showback evidence, credits appear unexplained, or an operator asks which usage merits investigation. Trigger with "Snowflake bill increased", "find idle Snowflake credits", "Snowflake cost attribution", or "untagged Snowflake spend". Do not use to mutate cost controls or claim savings.

skills/.curated/snowflake-cost-leak-hunter/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 0500b275e963c027f6b410e8c49c0446945c574e

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 12, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
2,916
Repository last updated
Nov 12, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Snowflake Cost Leak Hunter

## Overview

Produce a read-only, evidence-first Snowflake cost investigation. The deterministic
analyzer emits a typed ledger whose `total`, `attribution`, `context`, `estimate`, and
`invoice-only` roles cannot silently collapse into one savings claim.

**Problem:** Cost views answer different questions, arrive at different times, and do
not equal invoice truth. Generic advice easily turns observed credits into unsupported
prices or promised savings.

**Outcome:** A reproducible review packet that identifies what the supplied evidence
confirms, what was estimated from an approved rate, what remains at risk, and what is
Back to top