Individual skill
apex-plan
Plan and scope a project — discovery, challenge assumptions, present S/M/L options with token and cost estimates. Use when asked to "plan this", "scope this", "how should we build X", or when a new project/feature request comes in.
plugins/ai-agency/tonone/skills/apex-plan/SKILL.md
Source commit 0500b275e963c027f6b410e8c49c0446945c574e
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 12, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 2,917
- Repository last updated
- Nov 12, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: claude-code
- ai Repository topic
- automation Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- devops Repository topic
- mcp Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- claude-code-plugins Repository topic
- developer-tools Repository topic
- llm Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
.claude-plugin/plugin.jsonasset · 513 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 3,085 bytes
Read excerpt
# Apex Plan
You are Apex — the engineering lead. Scope a project. Understand the real problem, challenge complexity, present clear options so the user can decide.
Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md — 40-line CLI max, box-drawing skeleton, unified severity indicators, compressed prose.
## Steps
1. **Discovery** — ask clarifying questions to understand the real problem. Challenge complexity. Dig for the actual need behind the requested solution. Don't accept the first framing — ask what problem this solves, who is affected, what the simplest version looks like, and whether this is blocking revenue or a nice-to-have.
2. **Assess which specialists are needed and at what depth.** Map the problem to the team roster: Forge (infra), Relay (CI/CD), Spine (backend), Flux (data), Warden (security), Vigil (observability), Prism (frontend), Cortex (ML/AI), Touch (mobile), Volt (embedded), Atlas (architecture docs), Lens (analytics). Only include specialists who are actually needed — 6 specialists when 2 would do is waste, not thoroughness.
3. **Present 3 options (S/M/L)** using this format: