Menu

Individual skill

review-opinion-delivery

0upvotes

Convert reviewer-authored architectural construction-drawing notes, marked DWG/PDF locations, screenshots, and approved or draft DOCX files into a faithful, evidence-linked, page-verified Chinese Word deliverable. Use only when the reviewer has already formed the opinions, such as 整理审查意见、把审查笔记和标记图纸合成Word、补齐PDF证据截图、核对并排版可交付内审意见. Do not use to inspect drawings for new issues, judge code compliance, invent or change technical conclusions, or perform unrelated generic Word editing. If a request mixes new technical review with delivery work, separate the workflows and require explicit authorization before invoking building-review.

review-opinion-delivery/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 5ebae7e784c3ecc5615fe41861b9e924d88aeea9

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 11, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
14
Repository last updated
Sep 19, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# 施工图审查意见整理交付

Package opinions already made by the reviewer into a faithful, evidence-linked Word deliverable. Keep this workflow separate from technical drawing review.

## Non-Negotiable Boundary

- Treat the reviewer's latest confirmed DOCX as the highest content and style authority. Preserve its approved wording, item scope, certainty, regulation text, item consolidation, and mandatory/suggested status.
- Do not add, remove, strengthen, weaken, merge, split, or infer a technical conclusion without explicit reviewer approval.
- Use drawings only to locate marks and verify transcription. Do not derive new issues from them.
- Preserve `无` only when it is reviewer-approved or explicitly confirmed as an internal contradiction, missing name/index, or design-expression issue that does not assert an external threshold. An unreviewed placeholder `无` blocks delivery; regulation research, completion, and conclusion reclassification require a separately authorized `building-review` phase.
- Correct obvious typos, punctuation errors, and deterministic opinion-type aliases; record the before/after/reason in `edit_log.csv`.
- If a correction has two plausible results or could change `必须修改`/`建议修改`, technical meaning, applicability, or responsibility, mark it `需确认` and stop delivery.
- Every opinion type must resolve to one of the 12 canonical values in `references/opinion-types.json`; invalid or unresolved values are a hard failure.
- Record material source conflicts as `需确认`; do not silently correct professional substance.
Back to top