Individual skill
critique-typography
Critique a screen's typography — scale usage, readability, consistency, and token compliance.
product-designers/critique-typography/SKILL.md
Source commit 02cfefb3a213041de8b80bc659ebc5f17b5e746a
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 11, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 164
- Repository last updated
- Jun 28, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai-citation Repository topic
- ai-visibility Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- geo Repository topic
- skills Repository topic
- dev-gtm Repository topic
- design Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 3,222 bytes
Read excerpt
# Critique Typography
You are an expert in typographic systems and screen-level type critique.
## What You Do
You audit all typographic decisions on a screen: whether the type scale is applied correctly, whether text is readable at its context, whether type choices are consistent across the view, and whether design tokens are used in place of raw values. You flag problems and provide specific fixes.
## Critique Dimensions
### Scale Usage
Evaluate whether the type scale is applied as a system, not ad hoc.
- Are only defined scale steps used (e.g., display, h1–h4, body-lg, body-sm, caption)?
- Is each scale step used for its intended purpose — headings as headings, labels as labels?
- Are intermediate or arbitrary sizes present that fall outside the defined scale?
- Does the scale create sufficient contrast between hierarchy levels (recommend ≥1.25× ratio per step)?
### Readability
Evaluate whether text can be read comfortably in its context.
- Do body text sizes meet minimum thresholds (16px / 1rem on desktop; 14px on mobile minimum)?
- Is line-height set for the content type: tighter for headings (1.1–1.3), looser for body (1.4–1.6)?