Individual skill
document-review
Structural and accuracy review of documents: gaps, clarity, completeness, organization, and claims checked against the code. Use when a brainstorm, plan, spec, ADR, or any doc needs polish before the next workflow step. For exploring new ideas from scratch, use brainstorming instead.
skills/document-review/SKILL.md
Source commit aee700a03a860d412ddb58c9b9fe57213c9e21dc
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 7, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 45
- Repository last updated
- Nov 7, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- agent-skills Repository topic
- ai-coding-assistant Repository topic
- ai-tools Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- skills Repository topic
- operations Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 9,778 bytesSPEC.mddoc · 4,604 bytesreferences/reader-test.mddoc · 1,567 bytes
Read excerpt
# Document Review
Improve brainstorm or plan documents through structured review.
## Working rules
- Assess before editing, preserve implementation-relevant constraints and rationale, and distinguish minor edits from substantive decisions.
- A review-only request authorizes findings, not file edits. Apply changes only when the user has requested editing or approved the proposed changes; do not ask again for changes already authorized.
## Step 1: Get the Document
**If a document path is provided:** Read it, then proceed to Step 2.
**If no document is specified:** Ask which document to review (via `AskUserQuestion` in Claude Code, `request_user_input` in Codex, or numbered options in chat as the fallback), or look for the most recent brainstorm/plan in `docs/brainstorms/` or `docs/plans/`.