Individual skill

s4h-logic-council

Run a reasoning problem, argument, plan, or decision through a council of 5 logical reasoning advisors who analyze it from distinct reasoning frameworks, peer-review each other, and synthesize a verdict on whether the reasoning holds. MANDATORY TRIGGERS: 'logic council this', 'run the logic council', 'pressure-test this reasoning', 'is my thinking sound'. STRONG TRIGGERS: any complex argument where the conclusion matters, a plan with non-obvious dependencies, reasoning you've invested in and want stress-tested. Use ethics-council for moral questions, llm-council for general decisions — this council is specifically for testing the soundness of reasoning itself.

skills/s4h-logic-council/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit a30df8b67698ccb03ef5e35d68c2eddc5321ad3f

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD: Yes
Scanner rules are current: Yes
Repository scan complete: No
Skill scan complete: Yes
Observed behavior: Instructions only
Last checked: Nov 11, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings): 241
Repository last updated: Jul 15, 2026
License: MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

claude-code Repository topic
claude-code-plugin Repository topic
cognitive-frameworks Repository topic
creativity Repository topic
decision-making Repository topic
ethics Repository topic
mental-models Repository topic
problem-solving Repository topic
reasoning Repository topic
systems-thinking Repository topic
testing Derived category

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files

SKILL.mdcore · 9,632 bytes

Read excerpt


# Logic Council

A single reviewer catches some flaws in reasoning. A council catches more — because different reasoning frameworks find different failure modes. Formal logic catches invalid inferences. Systems thinking catches missing feedback loops. Bayesian reasoning catches base-rate neglect. First principles reasoning catches assumptions dressed as facts. Adversarial logic catches the strongest counter-argument you haven't faced yet.

Run all five. Let them disagree. The synthesis tells you where your reasoning is load-bearing and where it's hollow.

---

## The Five Reasoning Frameworks

### 1. Formal Logic
Tests deductive structure. Are premises stated? Do they support the conclusion? Are necessary and sufficient conditions correctly identified? Finds: invalid inferences, unstated assumptions doing hidden work, conclusions that overreach their premises, equivocation across terms.

### 2. Systems Thinking