Individual skill
journal-cover-letter-skill
Create, revise, benchmark, or check a cover letter for an academic journal submission from manuscript files. Use whenever a user wants a journal submission letter, asks to tailor a cover letter to a target journal, provides manuscript materials and asks for a letter, wants an existing academic cover letter improved, or submits a bibliometric/science-mapping manuscript. Route empirical research around one finding, evidence syntheses around what the synthesis changes in understanding, and bibliometric studies around what the map reveals about a field's structure or evolution. Do not use for job applications, recommendation letters, or business correspondence.
skills/journal-cover-letter-skill/SKILL.md
Source commit b1f2fc9e24ef2effd2e6abdf3ef3f2daaac77757
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 5, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 42
- Repository last updated
- Oct 1, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- codex-plugin Repository topic
- cover-letter Repository topic
- journal-submission Repository topic
- bibliometrics Repository topic
- science-mapping Repository topic
- skill-development Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 19,102 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 19,102 bytesagents/openai.yamlasset · 255 bytesassets/cover-letter-payload.bibliometrics.example.jsonasset · 3,570 bytesassets/cover-letter-payload.example.jsonasset · 2,278 bytesassets/cover-letter-template.mddoc · 755 bytesreferences/bibliometrics-playbook.mddoc · 10,035 bytesreferences/blind-benchmark-loop.mddoc · 2,217 bytesreferences/controlled-uplift.mddoc · 1,225 bytesreferences/editorial-iteration-rubric.mddoc · 2,658 bytesreferences/human-benchmark-protocol.mddoc · 4,531 bytesreferences/intake-and-fact-sheet.mddoc · 2,550 bytesreferences/journal-research-protocol.mddoc · 1,643 bytesreferences/loop-controller.mddoc · 5,310 bytesreferences/migration-v2.3-to-v3.0.mddoc · 1,080 bytesreferences/migration-v3.0-to-v3.1.mddoc · 680 bytesreferences/migration-v3.1-to-v3.2.mddoc · 604 bytesreferences/output-and-docx.mddoc · 948 bytesreferences/persuasion-calibration.mddoc · 1,641 bytesreferences/research-playbook.mddoc · 7,831 bytesreferences/review-playbook.mddoc · 4,736 bytesreferences/submission-branches-and-declarations.mddoc · 1,339 bytesscripts/audit_cover_letter.pyruns · 2,971 bytesscripts/extract_docx_content.pyruns · 1,196 bytesscripts/generate_audit_report.pyruns · 2,907 bytesscripts/render_cover_letter_docx.pyruns · 4,586 bytesscripts/validate_payload.pyruns · 6,967 bytes
Read excerpt
# Journal Cover Letter Skill v3.2
Turn verified manuscript facts into a clear editorial decision aid. Default to English unless the user requests another language. Prioritize biomedical and life-science submissions while remaining useful across disciplines.
## Core architecture: evidence anchor -> editorial meaning
Every persuasive claim must contain both parts:
- `empirical_anchor`: the concrete, manuscript-traceable observation selected for the editor;
- `editorial_meaning`: what that observation changes in understanding, interpretation, coordination, practice, or the next research decision.
For manuscripts with a distinctive empirical taxonomy, trend set, or named result pattern, also preserve an `authorial_empirical_fingerprint`: the minimum manuscript-native detail that lets an editor distinguish this paper from another paper on the same topic.
A letter fails when it offers facts without meaning, meaning without a traceable factual anchor, or a polished abstraction that erases the manuscript's empirical fingerprint. This is the central v3.1 rule.