Individual skill

investor-lenses

Named investor reasoning frameworks packaged as reusable analytical lenses — 12 lenses (deep value, quality franchise, inversion, scuttlebutt growth, GARP, cycle positioning, debt cycle, forensic short, cost drag, right-business, weak-system contrarian, three questions) that stack on top of evidence already gathered, each with ordered priority signals, hard disqualifiers, and documented failure modes.

agent/src/skills/investor-lenses/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit a79afbdb048f873433fdb651a667e43dd0bb735d

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Instructions only
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
37,999
Repository last updated
Nov 9, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Investor Lenses

## What a lens is

A lens is a **reasoning procedure**: a fixed, ordered set of questions plus explicit
veto rules, distilled from one investor's publicly published methodology. It is
applied *after* the evidence exists — it does not gather data and does not care
where the data came from.

The value of a lens is that it is **opinionated and therefore falsifiable**. A lens
tells you, before you look at the answer, which signals it ranks first and which
facts make it walk away. Two lenses disagreeing on the same evidence is the
product, not a bug: the disagreement localizes exactly which assumption the
decision rests on.
Back to top