Individual skill

thermal-fluid-analysis

Analyze thermal-fluid engineering systems, experiments, CFD, and correlations with explicit assumptions, validity limits, uncertainty, and mechanism-based interpretation. Use for heat transfer, fluid mechanics, phase change, HVAC, energy systems, turbomachinery, piping, or thermal management.

skills/thermal-fluid-analysis/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 3980282b717e36f032bf3b571c9b0136bd10ca3e

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 6, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
25
Repository last updated
Nov 6, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Thermal-Fluid Analysis

## Purpose

Develop decision-ready thermal-fluid analysis without separating numerical output from physical meaning. State what is measured, simulated, derived, assumed, or inferred; retain units, sign conventions, property states, system boundaries, and applicability limits.

## Analysis Workflow

1. Define the system: geometry, working fluid, operating regime, boundary conditions, performance metrics, and constraints.
2. Establish the physical model: governing balances, material properties and their evaluation state, dimensionless groups, competing mechanisms, and expected limiting behavior.
3. Select evidence: standards, handbooks, peer-reviewed work, calibrated measurements, validated CFD, or correlations inside their stated range.
4. Test credibility: dimensional consistency, conservation, order of magnitude, limiting cases, uncertainty/sensitivity, and an independent analytical or empirical check where possible.
5. Conclude by mechanism and tradeoff: performance, pressure drop or pumping power, manufacturability, reliability, cost, safety, scaling, and residual risk.
Back to top