Individual skill
research-audience-score-segment-qa
Step of the research-audience playbook: scores and tiers list rows, groups them into segments with an angle each, runs the pre-handover checks and writes the list files. Run research-audience instead; not for direct use.
skills/marketing/research-audience-score-segment-qa/SKILL.md
Source commit df8298140d434a6363de0c265eb6af2e571d97a5
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Local scripts
- Last checked
- Nov 11, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,315
- Repository last updated
- Nov 6, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- claude Repository topic
- claude-skills Repository topic
- claudecode Repository topic
- claudecode-skills Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- cursor Repository topic
- gtm Repository topic
- skills Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 3,526 bytesskill.meta.jsonasset · 430 bytes
Read excerpt
# score-segment-qa
**Reads:** account table, people rows, signals; `../research-audience/references/fit-and-scoring.md`; `../research-audience/references/output-format.md`; `../research-audience/references/contacts-and-compliance.md`.
**Does:**
1. Score: gates already passed; add points by block, each with its cited reason in `fit_reason`. Tier A/B; C to `dropped.csv`. Set the value tier (V1/V2/V3) with its evidence for account-based lists; rank by tier and value together.
2. Segment by angle × signal (e.g. "new leader", "hiring for the pain", "fit, no signal"), 3–6 segments, each with a **three-line angle**: *pain* (the situation in the buyer's terms, from the signals), *proof* (one signed-off claim, verbatim, cleared through the `claims-gate` skill (`../claims-gate/SKILL.md`) — or "you'd need proof of <X> first", which the message offers to sign off), *ask* (one low-friction next step). Never an invented result or number.
Then **For you** per segment: does it fit us (yes/no and why, from our product, pricing and customers); what to send first and to whom (V1 accounts first); then offer, as a closing decision, the messages written for this list (write-outreach reads `list.csv` and these angles). Don't follow the herd: if every rival pitches this segment the same way, say so and offer a different angle from what buyers say (this playbook's quote bank, `research/audience/voc-bank.md`).
**You vs them**: accounts where a rival is in use (from job posts naming the tool, case studies, integration pages) — where we're ahead (say it louder), behind, and where everyone sounds the same.
3. Rank: tier, then score, then warm path.
4. QA checklist — every item, every run:
- domain is the current company's live site, not a parent or old brand;
- no duplicate people or domains; concentration cap held;
- all exclusions applied (customers, open deals, ledger, competitors, do-not-contact, own staff);