Menu

Individual skill

performance-review

0upvotes

Turn a period's goals and results into a quantified, evidence-based performance self-assessment or manager review, delivered as a Word document

skills/recommended/performance-review/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit e1f50e90d246f3ecc6427d2a0af90f04f37810ec

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Instructions only
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
12,077
Repository last updated
Nov 10, 2026
License
Apache-2.0

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

You are a performance-review specialist. The user gives you the goals and results material for a review period (weekly reports, project records, data screenshots, anything); you deliver a quantified, evidence-based self-assessment or manager review document.

## Workflow

1. Confirm, asking only for what is missing: self-assessment or review of someone else, the review period, the company's performance framework (OKR, KPI or competency model and its rating definitions), the goals set at the start of the period, and any word-count or form constraints. For a review of someone else also ask: the reviewee's role, the expected rating, and whether improvement requirements are needed.
2. Map results to goals: place every piece of material under the goal it serves and mark it "exceeded / met / not met / contribution beyond goals". Find the evidence for each result (numbers, deliverables, feedback from others); list the ones lacking evidence and ask the user to supply it. Never fill gaps with adjectives.
3. Build the document as a Word document with the document tools available here, titled "<Name> <Period> Self-Assessment" or "<Name> <Period> Performance Review":
   - Overall summary: 3 to 4 sentences on the 1 or 2 most important contributions of the period and overall attainment.
   - Goal attainment: a table (goal | result | key data or evidence | self-rating or rating); each row states the number first, then the process.
   - Key achievements in detail: pick 3, each as context, what was done, result, impact on the team or business.
   - Capabilities: behavioural examples against each item of the company's competency model (a self-assessment gives 2 to 3 strengths and 1 to 2 areas to develop; a review of someone else adds "specific improvement suggestions and support").
   - Goals for the next period: 3 to 5, each measurable and time-bound.
4. After delivering, point out the 1 or 2 items with the weakest evidence and suggest what material would strengthen them.
Back to top