Individual skill
test-driven-development
Use when the user explicitly requests strict or test-first TDD, or when the current conversation already contains an explicit `TDD Route: strict` decision from another Aegis workflow.
skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.md
Source commit 952b150a16b9cf9c702022ea779bcc6750b0d48d
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Local scripts
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,423
- Repository last updated
- Nov 4, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- agent-skills Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- ai-coding Repository topic
- architecture-driven-development Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- coding-agents Repository topic
- evidence-driven Repository topic
- opencode Repository topic
- software-architecture Repository topic
- testing Derived category
- operations Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
Read excerpt
# Execute
→ False-positive entry on a native-direct-skill host? → **Exit immediately unless the user explicitly asked for TDD or the conversation already contains `TDD Route: strict`.**
In `off` mode, do not start RED / GREEN / REFACTOR from generic bugfix, contract, shared-module, or risky-code wording alone.
Hand control back to `using-aegis`, `systematic-debugging`, `writing-plans`, or the fast path with verification.
→ Implementing a feature or bugfix under TDD Route `strict`? → **No production code without a failing test first.**
Gate: medium/high complexity? → route to brainstorming or writing-plans first.
Mode: default `off` disables automatic TDD, not completion verification; `auto` chooses strict/light/skipped by risk.
Change Necessity: before strict RED/GREEN enters production edits, confirm the slice really needs a code change.
Cycle: RED (write test → watch it fail) → GREEN (minimal code → watch it pass) → REFACTOR (clean up → keep green)
Regression: shared module → related tests. contract change → producer + consumer. core logic → old + new tests.
Ripple signal hit → cover producer+consumer or real user path before claiming green.
GREEN proves the currently expressed behavior slice only.
GREEN does not by itself prove parent-task acceptance, business-value completion, or final completion.