Individual skill

nature-response

Draft, audit, or revise point-by-point reviewer response letters for Nature-family manuscript revisions. Use when the user provides reviewer comments, editor decision letters, revision notes, response drafts, or asks how to respond to major/minor revision requests, rebuttal letters, response to reviewers, peer-review reports, 审稿意见回复, 逐点回复, 修回信, 大修回复, 小修回复, or 如何回复 reviewer.

skills/nature-response/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit d394fb599ed9e6ea2212a9e6daa864345fe97a26

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD: Yes
Scanner rules are current: Yes
Repository scan complete: No
Skill scan complete: No
Observed behavior: Network or broad shell
Last checked: Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings): 6,031
Repository last updated: Oct 19, 2026
License: MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

academic-research Repository topic
ai-agents Repository topic
claude Repository topic
claude-code Repository topic
developer-tools Repository topic
mcp Repository topic
paper-writing Repository topic
zotero Repository topic
codex-cli Repository topic
openai-codex Repository topic
security Derived category
productivity Derived category
productivity-notes Derived category

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files

README.mddoc · 4,219 bytes
SKILL.mdcore · 6,910 bytes
SKILL.mdcore · 6,910 bytes
SKILL.mdcore · 6,910 bytes
SKILL.mdcore · 6,910 bytes
examples/conflicting-reviewers.mddoc · 1,467 bytes
examples/major-revision-with-missing-evidence.mddoc · 1,502 bytes
examples/minor-revision.mddoc · 1,719 bytes
references/action-mapping.mddoc · 3,706 bytes
references/chinese-author-alignment.mddoc · 3,341 bytes
references/comment-taxonomy.mddoc · 4,168 bytes
references/difficult-cases.mddoc · 4,073 bytes
references/intake-and-routing.mddoc · 4,999 bytes
references/qa-checklist.mddoc · 3,164 bytes
references/response-structure.mddoc · 3,621 bytes
references/source-basis.mddoc · 3,228 bytes
references/tone-and-stance.mddoc · 3,336 bytes
tests/conflicting-reviewers.mddoc · 1,817 bytes
tests/defensive-draft-audit.mddoc · 1,768 bytes
tests/evaluation-summary.mddoc · 2,205 bytes
tests/impossible-experiment.mddoc · 1,673 bytes
tests/major-revision-missing-evidence.mddoc · 1,818 bytes
tests/minor-revision.mddoc · 1,396 bytes
tests/rubric.mddoc · 2,682 bytes

Read excerpt


# Nature Reviewer Response Skill

Use this skill to convert editor decision letters, reviewer comments, author notes, or
draft rebuttals into an auditable point-by-point response package for manuscript revisions.

The response letter is an editor-facing verification document. The goal is to show that every
reviewer concern has been understood, addressed, and mapped to a concrete manuscript change,
justified scientific response, or unresolved author action.

## Default stance

- Preserve each reviewer comment faithfully before responding.
- Every reviewer concern must be answered, cross-referenced, or explicitly marked as unresolved.
- Map every response to manuscript evidence, a revision location, a justified disagreement, or `AUTHOR_INPUT_NEEDED`.