Individual skill
multi-perspective
Explore a research question through several independent analytical perspectives and synthesize their agreements and disagreements. Use when one line of reasoning is insufficient and distinct viewpoints should be preserved.
skills/multi-perspective/SKILL.md
Source commit 08dd9bdf9367f7321c27b7db8c08a125598a613f
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 6, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 150
- Repository last updated
- Nov 3, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-tools Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- latex Repository topic
- phd Repository topic
- research-workflow Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 14,014 bytesreferences/computational-many-analysts.mddoc · 5,424 bytesreferences/perspective-templates.mddoc · 1,999 bytes
Read excerpt
# Multi-Perspective Exploration
Spawn 3-5 parallel agents, each with a distinct disciplinary lens and epistemic prior, to independently investigate a research question. Then synthesise their findings into a structured comparison that surfaces agreements, tensions, and blind spots.
The core insight: a single-perspective analysis inherits the biases of that perspective. Deliberately introducing cognitive diversity — grounded in real disciplinary traditions — produces more robust research designs.
## Output Path
Per `rules/review-artefact-routing.md` (auto-loads in research projects (path-scoped to `paper-*/` and `paper/`)):
- **Source slug:** `multi-perspective`
- **Write reports to:** `reviews/<scope>/multi-perspective/YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM.md` inside the project, where `<scope>` is the paper slug (e.g., `paper-jtp`, `paper-philtech`) for paper-level reviews or `_project` for project-level reviews. Path is relative to the research project root, not the Task-Management repo.
- **Never** at project root (`./CRITIC-REPORT.md`-style filenames are forbidden — pre-rule layout).
- **Idempotency:** the timestamp includes minutes (`YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM`), so same-day runs are naturally separated. If multiple reports are generated in the same minute, append a descriptor (`{timestamp}-r2.md`, `{timestamp}-revision.md`) — never overwrite.