Individual skill
review-cluster
Deliver a mid-draft adversarial review of a paper — runs paper-critic + domain-reviewer + claim-verify + blindspot in parallel, optionally adds clarity-reviewer, then auto-synthesises into a prioritised revision plan. Use when the user requests a mid-draft adversarial review of a paper — runs paper-critic + domain-reviewer + claim-verify + blindspot in parallel, optionally adds clarity-reviewer, then auto-synthesises into a prioritised revision plan. Distinct from pre-submission-report (final-gate kitchen sink, 14 checks) — this is the active-drafting feedback loop. Triggers: 'review my draft', 'adversarial review', 'cluster review', 'mid-draft critique', 'feedback before pre-submission'.
skills/review-cluster/SKILL.md
Source commit 08dd9bdf9367f7321c27b7db8c08a125598a613f
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 11, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 151
- Repository last updated
- Nov 3, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-tools Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- latex Repository topic
- phd Repository topic
- research-workflow Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 19,773 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 19,773 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 19,773 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 19,773 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 19,773 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 19,773 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 19,773 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 19,773 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 19,773 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 19,773 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 19,773 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 19,773 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 19,773 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 19,773 bytes
Read excerpt
# Review Cluster — Mid-Draft Adversarial Feedback
> Parallel fan-out of a 4-agent read-only core on an active-drafting paper, optionally adding clarity-reviewer as a fifth agent, with auto-synthesise downstream. Lighter than `pre-submission-report --parallel`; designed for tight iteration, not final-gate verification. Outputs `reviews/<scope>/review-cluster/YYYY-MM-DD-cluster-report.md` (scope = paper slug from the paper path).
## Output Path
Per `rules/review-artefact-routing.md` (auto-loads in research projects (path-scoped to `paper-*/` and `paper/`)):
- **Source slug:** `review-cluster`
- **Write reports to:** `reviews/<scope>/review-cluster/YYYY-MM-DD.md` (scope = paper slug) inside the project. Path is relative to the research project root, not the Task-Management repo.
- **Never** at project root (`./CRITIC-REPORT.md`-style filenames are forbidden — pre-rule layout).
- **Idempotency:** if today's file exists, append a same-day descriptor (`{date}-revision.md`, `{date}-r2.md`, `{date}-pre-submission.md`) — never overwrite.
- **Index policy:** the consolidated cluster report is an output-only artefact and receives no `Check=review-cluster` row. Each active reviewer receives its own row with `Trigger=review-cluster`.
- **Infrastructure repos** (Task-Management, atlas-workspace, etc.): this section does not apply — the path-scoped rule won't load there.