Individual skill
replication-audit
Map claims in a literature to independent replications, robustness checks, failures, and unresolved evidence gaps. Use when assessing the empirical reliability of a body of findings rather than reproducing one project's code. For package rerunnability, use $replication-package.
skills/replication-audit/SKILL.md
Source commit 08dd9bdf9367f7321c27b7db8c08a125598a613f
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 6, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 150
- Repository last updated
- Nov 3, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-tools Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- latex Repository topic
- phd Repository topic
- research-workflow Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- security Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Read excerpt
# Replication Audit
> Examine which findings in a literature have been replicated, failed to replicate, or never been tested. Flag papers that build on non-replicated foundations.
Don't build your dissertation on a foundation made of sand.
## Output Path
Per `rules/review-artefact-routing.md` (auto-loads in research projects (path-scoped to `paper-*/` and `paper/`)):
- **Source slug:** `replication-audit`
- **Write reports to:** `reviews/<scope>/replication-audit/<YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM>.md` inside the project, where `<scope>` is the paper slug (e.g., `paper-jtp`) for paper-level reviews or `_project` for project-level reviews. Path is relative to the research project root, not the Task-Management repo.
- **Never** at project root (`./CRITIC-REPORT.md`-style filenames are forbidden — pre-rule layout).
- **Idempotency:** if the run timestamp already exists, append a same-run descriptor (`{timestamp}-revision.md`, `{timestamp}-r2.md`) — never overwrite the same `<YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM>` path.