Individual skill
rebuttal
Prepare a paper for peer review. Reads the paper and experiment results, selects the strongest ablations, anticipates reviewer questions, finds weaknesses before submission, and drafts rebuttals to actual reviews. Use when the user asks about "reviewer questions", "anticipate reviewers", "rebuttal", "paper weaknesses", "defend the paper", "strengthen the paper", "select the strongest ablations", "fortify the paper", or "prepare for peer review".
plugin/skills/rebuttal/SKILL.md
Source commit 04877622ff124d92d9ee8377109499c0afc6bf01
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 5, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 455
- Repository last updated
- Nov 1, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,113 bytes
Read excerpt
# Rebuttal: Prepare for Peer Review
Venue: $ARGUMENTS
## Step 1: Read the Paper and Results
Discover the paper, result and config files as in Step 1 (Discover Files) of `/labrat:paper-check`, including wandb logs and checkpoint directories. Then list the paper's claims (contributions and experiments), its metrics and baselines, and every available run and its outcome, including the ablation variants the configs define.
## Step 2: Vulnerability Analysis
Identify weaknesses from a reviewer's perspective:
### Technical Weaknesses
- Missing baselines that reviewers would expect