Individual skill

git-workflow

Use when naming or scoping a branch, writing or fixing a commit message, picking the gitmoji for a commit, untangling history (rebase versus merge versus squash), or cutting a versioned release — the portable git-convention layer for any repo. Covers gitmoji + Conventional Commits, SemVer tags, branch hygiene, force-push safety and gh pr/release mechanics. NOT the land-it decision and pre-ship checklist (that is `ship`), NOT an isolated checkout before coding (that is `worktrees`), NOT CI/CD release automation (that is `deployment`).

skills/git-workflow/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit d9d6bb338f66cc1e23998585e580a0ea45bbcb82

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 10, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
574
Repository last updated
Nov 9, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# git-workflow — the grammar and hygiene of version control

Git history is a message to the next human who reads `git log`, runs `git blame` on a broken line,
or bisects a regression at 2am. That human is usually future-you. **Every rule in this skill exists
to make the next reader's job faster**, not to make this moment cheaper. A repo with legible branch
names, conventional commits, and a clean linear narrative is a repo you can reason about; a repo with
`wip`, `fix stuff`, and force-pushed shared history is one you fight.

This is the **portable convention layer**. It is independent of any SDD phase or CI platform — it is
the grammar that `../ship/SKILL.md`, `../worktrees/SKILL.md`, and `../deployment/SKILL.md` all lean on.
It does not decide *whether to land* the work (that is ship) and it does not automate releases in a
pipeline (that is deployment). It tells you how to name, commit, untangle, and tag — correctly.

## Branch naming
Back to top