Individual skill

eval-skills

Eval and improve a skill against golden cases — run the target skill blind in a fresh, context-free subagent on each example input, grade the artifact against the expected outcome, and let the gaps drive the edits. Use when the user wants to test/eval/improve/harden a skill, says "this skill keeps producing X / keeps missing Y", or hands a skill plus example input→expected-output pairs. Pairs with [write-skills](../write-skills/SKILL.md) (the authoring principles every fix obeys).

skills/authoring/eval-skills/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 0867285d3f2612104afa6bb774779943854d4c15

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 4, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,466
Repository last updated
Nov 7, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Eval Skills

Treat a skill like a function under test. Feed it example inputs in a clean
room, check the artifacts against what good looks like, and let the failures
drive the edits. The eval is only honest if the run is **blind**: the agent
executing the skill must carry none of this conversation's context and must
never see the expected output. Leak either and you are teaching to the test.

## Inputs you need — refuse without them

Confirm all three before spawning anything. If any is missing or
unresolvable, stop and tell the user *exactly which one* and what a good
version looks like. Do not invent cases, guess intent, or eval against a
fuzzy wish.