Individual skill
Superior
Thinking skill for big problems that swaps the solver: reads the scope it was given, infers the scope the asker most likely means, maps that, then asks how a vastly smarter, fully informed intelligence with none of our habits or invented limits would do it, and turns every gap between its approach and ours into a change we can make. Built for large scope (how a whole system is implemented, an architecture, a strategy); when the intended scope is unclear or too small, a short interview settles it first. USE WHEN superior, how would a smarter intelligence do this, what would a genius or superintelligence do, if you knew everything, are we thinking too small, best possible approach, how should this whole system be built, analyze how this big thing is implemented. NOT FOR constraint teardown (FirstPrinciples), many options (BeCreative), attacking a plan (RedTeam).
LifeOS/install/skills/Superior/SKILL.md
Source commit f6ab5e0228bfb356c82edbf52b69344dbd585486
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Instructions only
- Last checked
- Nov 10, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
Standard SKILL.md format has not been attested at this commit. No installation command is available; inspect the source.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 19,783
- Repository last updated
- Nov 5, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- ai Repository topic
- augmentation Repository topic
- productivity Repository topic
- humans Repository topic
- ai-harness Repository topic
- intent-engineering Repository topic
- personal-ai Repository topic
- coding Repository topic
- lifeos Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
Intents/Elevate.mddoc · 6,133 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 8,726 bytesTools/.gitkeepasset · 0 bytes
Read excerpt
# Superior
Every approach we take is shaped by the mind taking it: what it happens to know, what it has seen done before, what it assumes is expensive or impossible, how much effort it expects to spend. Superior holds the task fixed and replaces that mind. It asks how an intelligence far beyond ours would do this exact task — one that knows everything relevant including the current frontier, carries no habits or inherited conventions, invents no constraints, reasons cleanly from first principles, and cares only about the real goal behind the request. Then it measures the distance between that approach and the one we were about to take, and closes as much of it as reality allows.
Superior is built for big problems: how a whole system is implemented, an architecture, a strategy, a multi-part build. On a one-function question the superior mind and ours give the same answer, so the pass earns nothing. The value appears at scale, where habits and invented limits compound across many decisions.
FirstPrinciples changes what we believe about the problem. Superior changes who is solving it. They pair well: Superior often surfaces a constraint we invented, and FirstPrinciples is the tool for proving it was invented.
## Ideal State
- The pass runs at the proper scope of § Scope Comes First and states it in one line with its reason; an ask too small to earn anything is widened by a scope interview or by stating the inferred scope, never run on the small scope as given. A scope the caller fixed runs as given, with no interview.
- The superior approach comes from the mind defined in § The Superior Mind, written before our current plan is reread (or by a blind agent when anchoring is likely), and is concrete enough to execute.
- Every difference between that approach and ours ends as an executable change or a named real limit, and no constraint the principal actually set is dropped.