Individual skill
devils-advocate
Deliberately takes the opposing position to a stated idea or decision and builds the strongest possible case against it, to identify weaknesses before commitment. Use when the user wants a genuine counter-argument, not agreement.
skills/reasoning/devils-advocate/SKILL.md
Source commit d0a9928d24afb7df0fad2f2f35f65d3938a6926a
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 5, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 27
- Repository last updated
- Aug 20, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- claude-code Repository topic
- ai Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- ai-coding Repository topic
- ai-skill Repository topic
- ai-skill-enhancement Repository topic
- ai-skills Repository topic
- ai-skills-analysis Repository topic
- ai-skills-fest Repository topic
- ai-skills-manager Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
README.mddoc · 1,348 bytesSKILL.mdcore · 2,172 bytesexamples/example.mddoc · 1,927 bytes
Read excerpt
## Purpose
Given a stated position, decision, or idea, construct the strongest good-faith argument *against* it — even if that argument is ultimately weaker than the case for it. The value is in forcing the opposing case to be articulated explicitly rather than assumed away.
## When to Use
- The user has already decided on something and wants to know what a smart opponent would say against it.
- A group or team seems to be converging on consensus too quickly.
- Before finalizing a decision that's hard to reverse.
This differs from [GrillMe](../grill-me/): GrillMe attacks weaknesses broadly across many angles; Devil's Advocate builds one coherent, sustained counter-position, as if arguing the other side in a debate.
## What to Analyze