Individual skill
standpoint-review
Standpoint review — check a change from the side that RECEIVES it: copy the receiving repo (or a clean install of the package) into an isolated folder, apply the change there, run that repo's OWN checks, have a reviewer judge the change against that repo's OWN rules with none of the author's explanation, then verify every finding against the source before acting on it. Use when asked whether a change breaks, or still works with, another repo, app, harness or package consumer that depends on it. Triggers: "입장 리뷰", "받는 쪽에서 돌려 봐", "하위 레포에서 돌려 봐", "그 레포 규칙으로 검증해 줘", "standpoint review", "run it from the target", "check it from the downstream repo", "make sure it won't break the repo that depends on it", "will this change break downstream users".
plugins/fh-commons/skills/standpoint-review/SKILL.md
Source commit 86a7a68a70a3812c05713f64081ca42a5bfddaa8
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 6, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 31
- Repository last updated
- Nov 8, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- knowledge-management Repository topic
- codex Repository topic
- harness Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- multi-agent Repository topic
- meta-harness Repository topic
- agent-governance Repository topic
- self-evolving Repository topic
- agentic-coding Repository topic
- loop-engineering Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
Read excerpt
# standpoint-review — review a change from the side that receives it
**Input**: the change (a diff such as `git diff <base>..HEAD > change.diff`, a dependency bump, or a
package build) and the repo or package that receives it.
**What it is, in one line**: family diversity (another model reads the diff) raises resolution
*within one standpoint*. Standpoint review changes *which ground truth* the change is checked against:
the receiving side's own rules, tests and conventions. A defect that only exists relative to the
receiver's conventions is invisible from the author's repo however many models read it.
**Why this exists (operator decision 2026-11-01)**: in forge-harness (FH) the standpoint axis runs as
an engine — a rule (`knowledge/shared/harness-core/field_verdict_crossfamily_gate.md` §7) plus a
commit-hook field (`standpoint:`) — for sessions running inside the harness repo. Someone who only
installs the plugin gets neither. This skill is the same procedure as a doorway they can call.