Individual skill

writing-user-docs

House style for user-facing documentation — voice, scope, structure, and what to leave out. Use this skill whenever writing, editing, or reviewing anything a user reads to learn how to use a tool — help center articles, getting-started guides, tutorials, feature docs, README usage sections, in-app help, release notes, or FAQ entries. Trigger it even when the request is phrased plainly — "document this feature", "write docs for X", "explain this to users", "write a README for this library", "turn these notes into a guide" — and even when no style guidelines are mentioned. Also use it to review existing docs for tone, bloat, or leaked implementation detail. Do not use it for internal engineering docs, architecture write-ups, RFCs, or code comments.

skills/writing-user-docs/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 59e9d17446a248b21d86f078fcd0bd2d36db1ca4

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,702
Repository last updated
Oct 8, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# User-facing documentation

Write for the person using the tool, not the person who built it.

"User" means whoever uses the thing. For an app, that's an end user. For a library, it's the developer who installs it. Either way they are *not* implementing it, and the docs should reflect that.

## Voice

Everyday English — the way you'd explain it to a colleague sitting next to you. Formality doesn't add authority, it just adds distance and words.

- **Second person, active, present tense.** "You tap Save," not "the Save button should be tapped" or "the user will then be able to save."
- **Cut "just," "simply," "easy," "obviously."** They add nothing when things work, and read as mockery when they don't.
- **No marketing adjectives.** "Powerful," "seamless," "robust," "intuitive" — that's the author admiring the product. The reader is mid-task and doesn't care.
- **One term per concept, matching the UI exactly.** If the button says *Workspace*, the docs never say "project" or "team space." Varying your vocabulary is good prose and bad documentation — every synonym reads as a new concept.