Individual skill

eursr-review-process

Use when you need to understand how the European Sociological Review (ESR) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind peer review, what comparative quantitative reviewers weigh, decision categories, and the ethics rules (anonymity, no simultaneous submission). Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-review-process/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,397
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Review Process (eursr-review-process)

Knowing how ESR reviews helps you pre-empt the failure modes before submitting. ESR uses **double-blind**
review and draws reviewers from the comparative quantitative-sociology community, so a paper must read
credibly to experts who scrutinize the comparative/longitudinal design and the modeling.

## When to trigger

- Before submitting, to stress-test the manuscript against likely reviewer objections
- Interpreting a decision letter and setting expectations
- Understanding why a portable mechanism *and* a defensible quantitative design both matter

## How ESR review works
Back to top