Individual skill

nature-reviews-chemistry

Use when targeting Nature Reviews Chemistry (Nat Rev Chem) or deciding whether a chemistry review proposal fits this commissioned, authoritative-review venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

English-NaturalScience-Journal-Skills/skills/nature-reviews-chemistry/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Nature Reviews Chemistry (nature-reviews-chemistry)

## Journal positioning

Nature Reviews Chemistry is a Springer Nature review journal that publishes authoritative, accessible reviews across the whole of chemistry — organic, inorganic, physical, analytical, materials, and chemical biology. Its defining character is that content is overwhelmingly invited and commissioned by a professional in-house editorial team: authors are recognized leaders, and articles are developed in close collaboration with editors rather than submitted cold. The journal publishes no primary research; its value is conceptual synthesis — framing a field, organizing competing ideas into a coherent narrative, and using figures as pedagogy so that a non-specialist chemist can grasp the state and trajectory of a subfield. Readership is the broad chemistry community plus adjacent scientists who need an expert's map of an area. This skill is a **fit / venue-selection / re-framing** tool. It does not replace the journal's current official guidelines. Before any contact, re-check the live author and proposal information on the Nature Reviews Chemistry site.

## When to trigger

- An author wants to propose or has been invited to write an authoritative, field-defining review across any area of chemistry.
- A leading researcher is choosing between Nature Reviews Chemistry and Chemical Reviews or Chemical Society Reviews for a synthesis-style article and needs to understand the commissioned, conceptual, accessibility-first model.
- A team has primary results and is mistakenly considering a "review" framing here; the trigger is to redirect them to a primary-research venue.
- An author needs the journal's expectations on conceptual framing, figure-as-pedagogy, and the pre-submission proposal route before approaching the editors.

## Scope & topic fit
Back to top