Menu

Individual skill

icassp-author-response

0upvotes

Use when drafting an ICASSP rebuttal or author response to reviews, covering the recently added and short author-response window, the single-blind setting where reviewers already know you, answering signal-processing reviewers from the four-page record without a revised PDF, and writing for the technical-committee decision rather than for tone.

ICASSP-Skills/skills/icassp-author-response/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# ICASSP Author Response

Use this after ICASSP reviews are released. First confirm whether the current cycle even runs a
rebuttal: ICASSP historically had **no** author-response stage, and a short window is a
comparatively **recent addition** (in the 2026 cycle authors could reply until ~22 December
2025). Reopen the current call before promising reviewers anything.

## What the rebuttal is and is not

- It is a **short, text-based reply** to the reviews, not a chance to upload a revised PDF or new
  experiments. Argue from what you already submitted.
- ICASSP is **single-blind**, so the reviewers know your identity; write professionally and do
  not attempt to re-establish anonymity or drop identifying hints to sway a reviewer.
- The audience is the **area/technical-committee decision**: give whoever aggregates the reviews
Back to top