Individual skill
ipsn-review-process
Use when reasoning about how an IPSN-lineage submission is evaluated, covering double-blind review, the per-track (IP / SPOTS) program committees, the rebuttal, Best Paper and Best Research Artifact judging, and how IPSN's process differs from SenSys's revision model, OpenReview venues, and CPS-IoT Week neighbors.
IPSN-Skills/skills/ipsn-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,410
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,096 bytes
Read excerpt
# IPSN Review Process
Model the pipeline before interpreting any single review. IPSN's process is **double-blind,
per-track, and conference-style** (not journal-style): a submission is read by a program committee
matched to its track — **IP** or **SPOTS** — and returns an accept/reject decision, usually with a
rebuttal opportunity. Because IPSN merged into **SenSys**, confirm the successor's exact mechanics on
the current call; the structure below is the IPSN-lineage model and what to expect.
## Process model
- Submission and review run on **HotCRP** with **double-blind** anonymity: author identities are
hidden from reviewers and reviewer identities from authors.
- Papers are matched to reviewers **by track**. An **IP-track** paper is read by method reviewers
(estimation, signal processing, learning, localization); a **SPOTS-track** paper by