Individual skill
colm-supplementary
Use when deciding what goes into a COLM paper's appendices and supplementary material versus the strict 9-page main text — verbatim prompts, full evaluation configurations, per-task result tables, contamination analyses, human-evaluation protocols, and anonymized code/data packages that survive double-blind review.
COLM-Skills/skills/colm-supplementary/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,393
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- data Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,833 bytes
Read excerpt
# COLM Supplementary Material
The 2026 format gives you a strict 9-page main text, unlimited citation pages, and
appendix space whose guaranteed audience is *nobody* — reviewers may read it, the
rebuttal may point into it, but no rule obliges anyone to open it. That asymmetry is
the whole design principle: the main text carries every load-bearing element, and
the supplement carries the *audit trail* that makes the main text checkable.
## The placement rule
Ask of each artifact: *is this needed to believe the claim, or to re-run it?*
Believe → main text. Re-run → appendix/supplement. Both → summarize in the main
text, deposit fully in the appendix, and cross-reference in both directions.
