Menu

Individual skill

arpsych-workflow

0upvotes

Use when deciding which arpsych-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing an invited review article from topic through revision for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-workflow/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# ARPsych Workflow Router (arpsych-workflow)

## Overview

This is the router. It tells you **which arpsych-* skill to use at the current stage** of an **invited review article** aimed at the *Annual Review of Psychology* (ARPsych) — the **Annual Reviews** (nonprofit) survey series for psychology, founded **1950**, published as an **annual volume**, and edited by **Susan T. Fiske** (检索于 2026-06；editor since 2000；以官网为准). It is among the highest-impact journals in the field (检索于 2026-06；JIF ~29.4 in 2024, ranked #1 in Psychology；以官网为准). ARPsych does **not** publish original empirical studies. It publishes **authoritative, accessible review articles** that synthesize a topic — across cognitive, social, developmental, clinical, biological/neuro, I-O, and methods psychology — for the whole field and adjacent disciplines. So the lifecycle is not "design → run → analyze → defend"; it is **find a synthesis-worthy topic → get on the Editorial Committee's commission list → read the whole literature → impose an organizing framework → cover it even-handedly → land the ARPsych voice → handle production → revise.**

Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as ARPsych and the artefact as an **invited review**, not a primary-research paper. Operational tells that you are at ARPsych and not a sibling: the work **reviews other people's findings** rather than reporting its own studies; **unsolicited manuscripts are not accepted** — the **Editorial Committee plans each volume and invites authors** (you may suggest a topic, but you cannot self-submit a finished paper) (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准); there is **no study of your own to power or preregister** (you appraise the studies you cover); the contribution is an **analytical map of a literature**, not a new effect. If the user has original data, they want a primary outlet (a *Psychological Science*, a JPSP, a specialty journal) — say so. If they have a stand-alone meta-analysis or a self-submitted review, that is **Psychological Bulletin**, not ARPsych.

## When to trigger

- The user asks "what should I do next?" on an invited review
- A review draft reads like an annotated bibliography and needs a spine
- Work is ping-ponging between coverage, framing, balance, and the invitation
- An ARPsych production/peer-review letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode
Back to top