Menu

Individual skill

iccv-writing-style

0upvotes

Use when drafting or revising the prose and figures of an ICCV paper, covering writing for an international generalist reviewer pool, the inclusive 8-page economy, mechanism-first exposition, calibrated claims that survive a one-page rebuttal cycle, and captions and figures that carry the paper for readers who skim first.

ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-writing-style/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# ICCV Writing Style

An ICCV submission is read by reviewers drawn from the most international pool in
computer vision — in 2025, every author of 11,239 submissions was also a
potential reviewer — and most of them work outside your subfield. The style
target is therefore precise: a paper a *generalist vision researcher* can
evaluate fairly in one sitting, in their second or third language, under
deadline pressure of their own.

## Write for the generalist, cite for the specialist

The three reviewers you draw will rarely all be specialists in your niche.
Concretely:
Back to top