Individual skill
ipsn-author-response
Use when drafting an IPSN-lineage rebuttal, covering the double-blind response to sensor-systems reviewers on ground truth, baseline fairness, deployment realism, energy accounting, and simulation-vs-real-hardware doubts, without leaking identity and without promising experiments not yet run.
IPSN-Skills/skills/ipsn-author-response/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- finance Derived category
- devops Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,706 bytes
Read excerpt
# IPSN Author Response
Use this after IPSN-lineage reviews are released. IPSN is conference-style: a short, decision-focused
**rebuttal** (verify the window and format on the current successor call), not a journal-style
revise-and-resubmit letter. The rebuttal must stay **double-blind** — no author names, institutions,
lab-named testbeds, or identity-revealing dataset/firmware links — and it must answer on the axes a
sensor-systems reviewer actually raised.
## Triage
- Answer what affects the decision: **evidence realism** (simulation vs real hardware), **soundness**
of the method/platform, **baseline fairness**, **ground-truth validity**, **deployment honesty**,
and **energy/latency accounting**.
- Use evidence that already exists or a number you can compute from data you already have — never a