Individual skill
gec-revision-and-rebuttal
Use when writing the response to a Global Environmental Change (GEC) revise decision. GEC reviewers are interdisciplinary and often disagree across disciplines, so the response must convert each reviewer on their own terms without alienating the handling editor. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-revision-and-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,402
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- writing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 3,961 bytes
Read excerpt
# Revision & Rebuttal (gec-revision-and-rebuttal)
A GEC **major/minor revision** is a real opportunity, but the manuscript usually faces **reviewers from
different disciplines** who may pull in opposite directions (a natural-scientist wants more data; a
governance scholar wants more theory). The response letter must move *every* reviewer toward yes while
keeping the handling editor confident the revision is convergent and the human-dimensions contribution
is intact.
## When to trigger
- A revise decision arrived and you are planning the revision + response letter
- Reviewers disagree with each other (often across disciplines) and you must reconcile
- A reviewer requests analyses or framing that would change the paper's claims
- Writing the cover note to the editor summarizing the revision