Individual skill

pods-topic-selection

Use when deciding whether a data-management project belongs at ACM PODS (the database-theory symposium) or should be routed to SIGMOD/VLDB/ICDE (systems), ICDT (its sister theory venue), LICS/ICALP/STOC (pure theory), or a journal (TODS/LMCS/JACM), by contribution shape, the result-swap test, and the PODS-vs-ICDT community fit.

PODS-Skills/skills/pods-topic-selection/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,401
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# PODS Topic Selection

Decide the venue before drafting. **PODS** — the ACM SIGMOD/SIGACT Symposium on **Principles of
Database Systems** — is the theoretical-foundations symposium held jointly with SIGMOD each year. Its
papers are **theorems about data management**: models, query languages, complexity bounds,
dichotomies, logic, and provably optimal algorithms. A technically strong paper whose real
contribution is a faster system, a benchmark win, or an engineering artifact is respected and then
rejected as out of scope — that paper is SIGMOD/VLDB/ICDE. PODS reviewers read for a **provable,
foundational** statement about a cleanly defined model.

## The routing question that matters most

The decisive question is rarely "is this about databases?" but **"is the contribution a theorem or a
system?"** If the headline is a bound, a dichotomy, a semantics, an expressiveness result, or an
Back to top