Menu

Individual skill

acl-review-process

0upvotes

Use when reasoning about how an ACL paper travels through ACL Rolling Review and conference commitment, covering reviewer and area-chair roles, meta-reviews, the commitment decision by senior area chairs and program chairs, Findings versus main-conference outcomes, ethics review escalation, and resubmission strategy across cycles.

ACL-Skills/skills/acl-review-process/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,397
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# ACL Review Process

Use this to model where an ACL paper actually is and who decides what next.
ACL decoupled reviewing from the conference: ARR produces the review package;
the conference consumes it. Confirm current mechanics at
aclrollingreview.org/reviewing, since cycle structure has changed repeatedly
(most recently to 10-week cycles in 2025).

## The pipeline, stage by stage

1. **ARR cycle intake**: submission on OpenReview to a dated cycle (e.g.,
   ARR January 2026); checks for format, Limitations, checklist, anonymity.
2. **Review**: at least three reviewers score and write reviews.
3. **Author response + discussion**: authors reply; reviewers discuss and may
Back to top