Individual skill
ssi-related-work
当需要为《中国科学:信息科学》(Scientia Sinica Informationis, SSI) 稿件撰写相关工作与文献综述、明确本文与已有工作的差异(delta)时调用。覆盖差异优先的定位写法、国内外文献的均衡覆盖(不只引英文也不只引中文)、按技术脉络组织综述、评述栏目与论文相关工作节的不同要求、自引与利益关系处理、以及参考文献著录规范。作为国家级大信息学科综合旗舰,本刊看重创新高度,相关工作是论证"新在哪里"的关键,需客观、充分、有观点。
Scientia-Sinica-Informationis-Skills/skills/ssi-related-work/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,411
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 7,084 bytes
Read excerpt
# 《中国科学:信息科学》相关工作与文献综述(Related Work)
在《中国科学:信息科学》(SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, SSI),相关工作不是"礼节性罗列",
而是论证**创新高度**的关键:审稿人据此判断你与国内外已有工作的差异(delta)是否显著。
本刊定位高、以重大原创与**评述**为主,因此无论是论文的相关工作节,还是评述栏目的系统综述,
都要求客观、充分、有观点。以下给出可操作写法。
## 一、差异优先(delta-first)
- 每谈一类相关工作,落脚到**它与本文的差异**:别人做了什么、局限在哪、本文如何不同/更进一步。
- 用一两句能讲清"本文首次/首要的不同",让非本子方向的信息学科读者也能抓住创新点。
- 避免"综述式罗列 + 一句'但他们没做我们的'"的偷懒写法;差异要具体到问题、方法或结论层面。
## 二、国内外文献均衡覆盖