Individual skill

revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance

Use when testing exhaustiveness, risk-of-bias, heterogeneity, and sensitivity for a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis. Hardens the synthesis against omission and fragility; it does not build the conceptual spine (revedres-organizing-framework) or settle coding reliability and open materials (revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility).

Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Comprehensiveness & Balance (revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance)

## When to trigger

- The corpus and framework exist, but you have not stress-tested coverage or robustness
- A pooled effect is reported without heterogeneity, bias, or sensitivity analysis
- You worry a reviewer will name an omitted study, school, or contradictory finding
- Conflicting studies are being tallied rather than weighed by design quality

## Comprehensiveness: prove there are no holes

RER asks for **comprehensive** reviews; the burden is on you to make exhaustiveness *provable*, not asserted.

1. **Saturation evidence.** Show that the search reached the point where new searches stopped yielding eligible studies (from `revedres-literature-synthesis`).
Back to top