Menu

Individual skill

revedres-proposal-and-commissioning

0upvotes

Use when writing the protocol, fixing scope and eligibility, and (where applicable) preregistering a systematic review or meta-analysis before searching, for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Produces the a-priori plan; it does not run the search (revedres-literature-synthesis) or impose the conceptual spine (revedres-organizing-framework).

Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,400
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Protocol & Preregistration (revedres-proposal-and-commissioning)

## When to trigger

- Topic selection cleared the four RER fit tests and it is time to lock the plan
- You are about to search but have not written down inclusion/exclusion rules
- You want a PROSPERO / OSF registration so the search is demonstrably a-priori
- A reviewer is likely to ask "were these inclusion rules set before or after you saw the results?"

## RER is SUBMITTED, not commissioned — the protocol replaces the commission

Annual Reviews *invite* their authors; **RER reviews are submitted and peer-reviewed**, so no editor pre-blesses your scope. The credibility that an invitation would have signaled must instead come from a **transparent, a-priori protocol**. For a systematic review or meta-analysis this is not optional polish — it is the difference between a synthesis and a fishing expedition. (RER occasionally publishes *solicited* analytic reviews of special topics, but the default and the bar is a strong unsolicited submission — 检索于 2026-06；以官网为准.)

## The protocol: decisions to fix BEFORE you search
Back to top