Individual skill
ecai-related-work
Use when writing the ECAI related-work section — covering the relevant general-AI lanes (symbolic, learning, multi-agent, application) for a broad reviewer pool, writing delta-first positioning, keeping self-citations double-blind, and doing it within a tight reference budget (1 page standalone / 2 pages in IJCAI-ECAI 2026).
ECAI-Skills/skills/ecai-related-work/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,404
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- finance Derived category
- writing Derived category
- education Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,368 bytes
Read excerpt
# ECAI Related Work
ECAI's related work has a peculiar difficulty: the reviewer pool is **broad** (a planning paper may
draw a KR reviewer and an ML reviewer), yet the **space is tiny** — the body is 7 pages and
references overflow into only 1 page (standalone ECAI) or 2 pages (IJCAI-ECAI 2026). You must
position against the right lanes for a general audience *and* stay compact.
## Cover the lanes a general-AI reviewer will expect
Identify which AI lanes your contribution touches and place it in each — a broad reviewer will fault
a section that only cites its author's home subfield:
- **Symbolic / foundational lane** — the KR, planning, search, reasoning, or argumentation line
your problem sits in.