Individual skill

pldi-experiments

Use when designing or auditing a PLDI evaluation — choosing defensible benchmark suites and baseline compiler configurations, measuring runtime, compile time, and memory with warmup and variance discipline, running ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, and scoping claims to the platforms measured.

PLDI-Skills/skills/pldi-experiments/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,411
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# PLDI Experiments

A PLDI evaluation answers one question: *does the claimed mechanism cause the
claimed effect on programs that matter?* Everything in the design flows from
making that causal link auditable. The community's shared rubric is SIGPLAN's
Empirical Evaluation checklist (see `pldi-reproducibility` for the measurement
hygiene); this skill covers the design choices above the hygiene layer.

## Benchmark choice is an argument, not a default

- **Justify the suite** relative to the claim: an allocation optimizer needs
  allocation-heavy programs *and* allocation-light ones (to show no regression);
  a parser-facing analysis needs real grammars, not microbenchmarks.
- **Use community suites where they exist** and state versions; add real-world
Back to top