Individual skill
pldi-experiments
Use when designing or auditing a PLDI evaluation — choosing defensible benchmark suites and baseline compiler configurations, measuring runtime, compile time, and memory with warmup and variance discipline, running ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, and scoping claims to the platforms measured.
PLDI-Skills/skills/pldi-experiments/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,411
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,144 bytes
Read excerpt
# PLDI Experiments
A PLDI evaluation answers one question: *does the claimed mechanism cause the
claimed effect on programs that matter?* Everything in the design flows from
making that causal link auditable. The community's shared rubric is SIGPLAN's
Empirical Evaluation checklist (see `pldi-reproducibility` for the measurement
hygiene); this skill covers the design choices above the hygiene layer.
## Benchmark choice is an argument, not a default
- **Justify the suite** relative to the claim: an allocation optimizer needs
allocation-heavy programs *and* allocation-light ones (to show no regression);
a parser-facing analysis needs real grammars, not microbenchmarks.
- **Use community suites where they exist** and state versions; add real-world