Individual skill
revacc-rebuttal
Use when a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) revise-and-resubmit has arrived and you must plan the revision and draft the point-by-point response — resolving the editor's first-order concerns (identification, the channel, measurement, or the model) before writing the letter. Plans and drafts the response; it does not run the new analyses from scratch (revacc-data-analysis) or re-run the submission preflight (revacc-submission).
Review-of-Accounting-Studies-Skills/skills/revacc-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,403
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- finance Derived category
- writing Derived category
- data Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,067 bytes
Read excerpt
# R&R Revision & Response (revacc-rebuttal)
## When to trigger
- You received a RAST **revise-and-resubmit** and must plan the revision
- You need to draft the point-by-point response to the editor and referees
- Referees disagree and you must triage which concerns are binding
- New analyses change tables and the manuscript needs re-aligning
- An analytical paper's referee disputes an assumption or a proposition
## An R&R at RAST is a strong signal — treat it accordingly
Because RAST often decides on the first round, an R&R is a meaningful vote of confidence rather than routine. That raises the stakes on getting the revision right: you may not get a third round, so resolve the **editor's first-order concerns substantively**, not rhetorically. Do the analytical (or modeling) work **before** drafting the letter — a RAST R&R turns on whether you have actually strengthened **identification, the economic channel, construct measurement, or the model**, not on rhetorical skill.
