Individual skill
red-review-process
Use when understanding or planning around the Review of Economic Dynamics (RED) editorial process — the editor desk/suitability screen, single-anonymized refereeing with a minimum of two reviewers, and RED's fast-review orientation without promising a fixed decision date. Sets expectations and timelines; it is not the submission preflight (see red-submission).
Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- operations Derived category
- writing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,220 bytes
Read excerpt
# Review Process at RED (red-review-process)
## When to trigger
- Setting expectations on timing and review model before or after submitting
- Understanding what the desk screen decides and what reaches referees
- Planning around the single-anonymized (not double-blind) model
## How RED review works (verified)
- **Desk / suitability screen first.** The editor first assesses whether the paper is suitable for RED;
papers that pass are sent out for review. A clean, in-scope, dynamic-model paper clears this faster.
- **Single-anonymized review.** Reviewers' identities are concealed from authors, but **author identities
are visible to reviewers** — this is *not* double-blind, so you do **not** anonymize the manuscript.