Individual skill

colt-author-response

Use when drafting a COLT (Conference on Learning Theory) rebuttal after initial reviews, handling proof-correctness objections, tightness and novelty-of-technique challenges, the area-chair identity-reveal rule, and concession strategy for theorem-first papers where one unrepaired gap outweighs every polished answer.

COLT-Skills/skills/colt-author-response/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# COLT Author Response

Use this after COLT reviews arrive. The COLT 2026 CFP (checked 2026-07-08) stated that
initial reviews are sent to authors before final decisions and that authors get an
opportunity to address issues raised — a rebuttal phase, run through CMT in that cycle.
Exact window length, character limits, and attachment rules are announced with the
reviews; read that announcement before writing a word.

## What a COLT rebuttal is for

A COLT review stands or falls on correctness first, then on the significance of the
result and the novelty of the technique. The rebuttal is your one chance to:

- repair a *perceived* gap by pointing at the exact appendix line that closes it;
Back to top