Individual skill
corl-writing-style
Use when writing or revising a CoRL paper's prose — leading with the embodied task and the learned component, calibrating claims to evaluation scale, writing the mandatory Limitations section as a scored asset, fitting the argument into 8 pages, and satisfying a dual reviewer audience of ML and robotics readers.
CoRL-Skills/skills/corl-writing-style/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,409
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- writing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,443 bytes
Read excerpt
# CoRL Writing Style
A CoRL paper is read by two audiences at once: reviewers fluent in learning
methods who will probe the algorithmic claim, and reviewers fluent in robots who
will probe the physical claim. Prose that serves only one of them loses the
other's score. The style guidance here is about keeping both readers oriented
inside 8 pages — with a mandatory Limitations section spending part of that
budget (CoRL 2026 instructions, corl.org, read 2026-07-08).
## The opening contract
By the end of page 1, both audiences should be able to answer four questions:
1. **What does the robot do** that it couldn't before? (task family, concrete)