Individual skill

ahr-structure-and-exposition

Use when organizing an American Historical Review (AHR) article so narrative and analysis work together within the roughly 8,000-word target (notes excluded). The AHR prizes articles that tell a story and argue a point at once. Shapes structure and flow; it does not generate the underlying argument or evidence.

American-Historical-Review-Skills/skills/ahr-structure-and-exposition/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Structure & Exposition (ahr-structure-and-exposition)

An AHR article must **tell a story and make an argument at the same time**, within roughly **8,000
words** of text (notes, tables, and charts excluded — verify the current figure). This skill is about
architecture: where the thesis sits, how chronology and analysis interleave, and how to keep a long
historical argument legible.

## When to trigger

- Outlining the article or reorganizing a draft that "wanders"
- The narrative and the argument feel like two separate papers
- Over the word target and unsure what to cut
- A reader said the structure is "hard to follow" or "front-loaded with background"
Back to top