Individual skill
cpa-identification
Use when the research design is the bottleneck for a 《中国行政管理》 manuscript — choosing and stress-testing a quantitative, qualitative, or normative design and matching it to the research question. Stress-tests the design before drafting exhibits; does not write the policy implications. 本技能服务于《中国行政管理》(Chinese Public Administration, CPA)。
Chinese-Public-Administration-Skills/skills/cpa-identification/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,411
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- design Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,392 bytes
Read excerpt
# 研究设计与因果推断(cpa-identification)
## 触发时机
- 不确定该用定量、定性还是规范分析
- 做了问卷但只跑了描述统计 + 主观判断
- 案例研究只是"讲故事",没有清晰的设计逻辑与证据链
- 想用准实验(DID / IV / 断点)但不确定问题是否适配
## 第一原则:方法服务于问题
**先看研究问题的性质,再选方法。** 把流行的因果识别方法硬套到本质是规范或描述性的问题上,是《中国行政管理》审稿人最反感的"方法错配"。
| 研究问题性质 | 适配设计 |