Individual skill

jar-theory-development

Use when building the economic mechanism and deriving signed, falsifiable predictions for a Journal of Accounting Research (JAR) manuscript — grounding hypotheses in information economics, contracting, and disclosure theory rather than psychology-style construct chains. Builds the mechanism; it does not design the empirical test (jar-methods) or run it (jar-data-analysis).

Journal-of-Accounting-Research-Skills/skills/jar-theory-development/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,409
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Theory & Prediction Development (jar-theory-development)

## When to trigger

- Predictions are descriptive ("X is associated with Y") with no economic channel
- A referee asks "what is the mechanism?" or "why would a rational agent do this?"
- The sign of the effect is ambiguous and needs an explicit argument
- You need to motivate an empirical prediction from an analytical/agency model

## How JAR theorizes: economics first

JAR's dominant tradition is **positive, economics-based** accounting research. Predictions are derived from the behavior of informed economic agents — managers, investors, analysts, auditors, regulators — under asymmetric information, contracting frictions, and proprietary costs. The relevant toolkit is **information economics** (signaling, disclosure, adverse selection), **agency/contracting theory** (incentives, monitoring, debt covenants), **market price-formation** logic (how information enters prices and expectations, in the Ball-Brown lineage), and **standard-setting/political-economy** arguments. This is *not* the latent-construct, mediator-moderator style of psychology-based fields: a JAR mechanism is an economic argument about incentives and information, often disciplined by a simple model.

## Build the mechanism
Back to top