Individual skill
ahr-argument-development
Use when turning archival findings into a sustained historical argument for The American Historical Review (AHR). The AHR rewards a clear thesis that earns its claims from evidence while remaining alert to contingency and complexity. Builds the argument and its stakes; it does not gather new sources or fabricate evidence.
American-Historical-Review-Skills/skills/ahr-argument-development/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,623 bytes
Read excerpt
# Argument Development (ahr-argument-development)
The AHR publishes **arguments**, not chronicles. A pile of well-researched facts is not yet an article;
an article advances a **thesis** — a contestable claim about the past — and earns it from primary
evidence while honoring historical contingency. This skill turns "here is what happened" into "here is
what it means and why it matters."
## When to trigger
- You have rich material but cannot state your thesis in a sentence
- The draft narrates events without making a claim
- A reader said the piece is "descriptive," "all background," or "doesn't add up to anything"
- The argument over-claims (too clean) or under-claims (buried, hedged into nothing)
